Monday, August 16, 2010

Agenda 21 and Its Implementation of World Scientific Socialist Collectivism”

Are you standing on the Rock of Salvation?


By Alan Watt For Sovereign Independent 2nd Edition

The majority of the world’s public have been trained into believing that their governments are responsible for shaping their future well-being on their behalf and for their welfare. These governments appear to have no particular long-term mandates beyond basic projects regarding jobs, economy, health-care, etcetera.

This same public is in complete ignorance to the fact that powerful, incredibly rich, private, tax-free foundations, funding thousands of non-governmental organizations, have worked together to bring in a new global planned society by using national governments. Such foundations, which are not responsible to the public for their actions and agendas, have for a hundred years through a standardized world-wide education program, been training generations from kindergarten on through, into a world-view by which the subjects of such indoctrinations are unconsciously programmed for major shifts in lifestyles and beliefs which are planned for them to experience as they grow and age.

This technique is called predictive programming. These foundations, via their almost infinite full-time activist NGO’s, push and pressure planned change (called trends) by lobbying governments, and churning out thousands of reports and documentaries to shape perceptions of the general public. The collective goal is toward a new humanistic, neo-Marxist, planned world society. (See “Foundations: Their Power and Influence” by Rene A. Wormser, and Norman Dodd’s Report to the Reece Committee on Foundations, 1954) The men who own and control these foundations believe that in order for their own survival, from a Darwinian perspective, the populations in a post-industrial era must be radically reduced in order for the fittest to survive, as they believe it should be.

The Club of Rome, for instance, being a premiere think-tank comprised of academicians, admits in their own writings that they were given the task of finding a plausible reason for the world’s peoples to give up all rights, freedoms, security, decision-making, et cetera, so that the emerging world super-state can more efficiently run the world. (“The First Global Revolution” by the Club of Rome) Their ‘noble lie’ was to terrify the public with scenes of famine, starvation, global warming and other natural disasters which they claimed would be caused by man.

Through treaties via the United Nations, not only all nations, but all individuals would gradually concede all rights to a global body of experts. Agenda 21, as is typical of United Nations’ treaties is simply the ongoing upgrade or implementation of this agenda from a previous global treaty. (The United Nation’s treaty called General Assembly resolution 44/228 of 22 December 1989.) This in turn, came from the Rio Earth Summit (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992

U.N.’s Agenda 21 link

Such treaties originating under the auspices of the United Nations are completely interwoven with dozens of other U.N. treaties, some of which specialize in particular areas of the planned changes within societies. Agenda 21, for instance, completely encompasses population, sustainability, economy and ecology and makes unlimited use of its army of professors and institutions to present to governments by their full-time lobbyists. Indeed, since World War II especially, governments and their policies appear to be run directly by these foundations, private think-tanks and NGO pressure groups.

The term ‘century of change’ has been used within academia from the last century, pertaining to the emergence of this new expert-run, planned and regulated society. Agenda 21 is this agenda for the 21st century, much of which is already implemented by signatories to this and other U.N. treaties. It ranges from population reduction, animal-only corridors (no human building or access rights,) to the redistribution of wealth and the eventual (inferred elimination of rights to travel by private automobile ownership.) Experts will decide what you will believe, how you will live, where you will live and eventually if you will even be allowed to breed. Because of the highly controversially nature of planned changes, the U.N. advises (from their own site) members and workers of the plan to mislead public understanding of this agenda by the use of a variety of terms. See below: (The United Nations’ Millenium Paper, issue 2, page 3)

“Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth.”

Link to the above:

Branches of Agenda 21 participants under a variety of sustainability terms and groups have already been advising nations, states, right down to local governments for quite some years. Since a main objective is to create sustainable communities, the term ‘communitarianism’ is frequently used along with many environmental groups, the latter constantly via preferred access to all media outlets, constantly chanting of eminent environmental disasters should their policies not be followed. Through the standardization of education and educational policy via UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) generations are programmed into believing in the necessity of this agenda, with all the conviction of an extremely fundamental religion, consisting of an amalgamation of Marxist Socialism, Secular Humanism and Environmentalism. It is the only politically correct, authorized religion advocated by the world’s policy makers. One of the earlier planners of the coming new society, Lord Bertrand Russell coined the term “scientific indoctrination” to describe the method.

All media and entertainment is lobbied to ensure they promote all aspects of Agenda 21 through inclusion in talk shows, children’s cartoons, novels, documentary presentations and movies. Unquestioning repetition, a kind of “psychic driving,” using slogans related to sustainability, international community, climate disasters, coming scarcities, et cetera, are mentioned hundreds of times per day in classrooms, print media, television and radio. With scientific indoctrination, perception becomes reality and explains the vast use of marketing specialities such as perception management. Countless well-known, popular personality figures such as Mikhail Gorbachev have full-time salaries from foundations and by government grants enabling them to constantly “do the rounds” of television interviews, university lectures, addressing NGO meetings, et cetera. Indeed, to paraphrase Mr. Gorbachev in one of his books, “We are in the process of creating a new religion for the world and it is and must be a form of earth worship.” Of course, in this new religion, ecologists and approved specialists are the new priesthood. Lord Bertrand Russell also referred to this academic priesthood, claiming that tyrannical rule was the only way to shift self-determination from the hands of individuals to the scientific elite. He claimed if there is to be a tyranny, then he preferred it be a scientific tyranny. Macabre beauty of such overwhelming micro-management of selective, one-sided data administered by scientific indoctrination technique ensures the vast amount of subjects who have grown up in it are guaranteed to be unquestioning believers, completely unable to use critical thinking with regards to the repetitive data. Even if they could, there would be instant Self-Policing and guilt associated with even approaching the thought of possible doubt, making them immediately retire into the approved comfort-zone of their collective peer-group.

The technique of scientific indoctrination is based on complete understanding of the same psychologically-proven methods of the great persisting religions. One might say that sociology and behaviourism works perfectly with theoretical Marxism in establishing this new order. Marxists know, rather than attempting to alter the behaviour, beliefs and perceptions of adults within masses, by propaganda and mass persuasion, it is easier to “grow” a fresh crop from birth. The adults will be made to conform by law and the threat of force for non-compliance. This is the reason UNESCO funds and operates numerous world youth programs, many run through national schooling, ensuring standardized indoctrination. It is also the reason for Mr. Gore and others to give copious talks aimed at/ to very young children, telling them their parents don’t know or understand the imperative need for change as they (the children) do themselves. In Marxist terminology, the parents, with old-fashioned, outdated beliefs in self-determination and natural freedoms, are a danger to the world and all to come. They are, therefore, “Contaminated.”

David Rockefeller, head of many international, socialist organizations, when asked concerning peoples’ resistance to this new social order said, “They (the people) will come to us (the rulers-experts) with perfect docility.” He could say this with confidence due to his complete awareness of the techniques of indoctrination already successfully accomplished and that with every passing year, the propaganda was working the paradigm shift from what had been a lowly Fabian’s Society dream of power over all, to its open manifestation in the 21st century.

Cutting Through The Matrix

Isaiah 55:6
Make search for the Lord while he is there, make prayer to him while he is near:Isaiah 55:7Let the sinner give up his way, and the evil-doer his purpose: and let him come back to the Lord, and he will have mercy on him, and to our God, for there is full forgiveness with him.
John 3:16
For God had such love for the world that he gave his only Son so that whoever has faith in him may not come to destruction but have eternal life

God bless you!
You can share this note by clicking on the button below.

Agenda 21 and Its Implementation of World Scientific Socialist Collectivism”SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend